During Soviet times state farm "Moscow" was known as a high-tech hothouse farm which produced products for the "Kremlin". Today about 1000 people (on its official site it is specified that 2,5 thousand) work on Closed Joint-Stock Company "Agrocombinat Moscow". Manufacture is divided into 12 branches (shops). Only nonresident Russians are being employed to work. They are hired - on a work-record book and labour contract but its copy is not given on hands. Salary - a bargain plus salary. On gathering they pay 5 roubles for 1 box of the collected fruits. In a day it's possible usually to collect from 100 up to 200 boxes, though much, certainly, depends on a harvest. Thus, nominal salaries during a season - 20-30 thousand roubles. However, they really pay 10-16 thousand: cut off and do not explain the reason. To all attempts to talk it over the management answer by cries and gross-out. The working day lasts 14 hours - from 6 in the morning till 8 in the evening. However, they don't pay for 6 hours at workplace over obligatory 8. There are no days off and they pay for a work during week-ends as for usual day (instead of double payment as it is necessary according to the Labour Code of the Russian Federation). Thus they deduct for one day absence 1000 roubles.

Personnel perturbations made by president Putin before elections and numerous "manifests" of "Edinaya Russia" about exclusive role of this party in life of our country give full representation about ideological policy and incorporated aims of the high ranking representatives of the Kremlin and its "Edianay Russia". Their joint creative work, in my opinion, is anxious only by the establishment of own self-value of "arbiter" of the huge country. Apparently, no recovery of sight is expected . Therefore we, non-edinorossies have only sharp civil not indifference to the destiny of Fatherland. And also desire - that ailing would be treated by doctors instead of engineers, the rights of the population would be protected by lawyers instead of butchers, secrets of foes - would be found out by spies instead of laymen. And, at last, that our Fatherland would be headed by true fathers of ALL nation instead of the leaders of some separate groups ...

In the beginning of present selective cycle there was two-party model to which administration of the president in Russia obviously was looking for. The external reason is - an imitation of democratic process in the country, internal one - exploitation of the old principle "divide et impera" according to which two loyal to a political mode and economic structure groupings should struggle for access to the state feeding troughs, simulating for the population an opportunity of "making choice". In the light of the given model formation of the second propresidential party "Fair Russia" which actually should finish emulation of the American model seemed to be natural: patriotism and unity (republicans) - Edinaya Russia, validity and social rate (democrats) - Fair Russia, other parties in that system obviously were not demanded. Why did then Putin make so inconsistent step within the limits of a system under construction - obviously supported Edinaya Russia? Probably, it is connected with incompleteness of formation of the second player - "Fair Russia" and appearance of the third player - the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.

If you learned to read at the Soviet government or studied in the educational institutions created at the Soviet government, it doesn't mean that it's necessary to someone today. Now you only interfere. The countries of NATO have enough servants such as the Poles, Estonians, Bulgarians, Hungarians and other rag-tag. Plus Georgians and Mexican. That is the whole cohort of those who hate us is being aimed at Russia, they think that the Russian dirty dogs should seriously share their territory and treasures. As it already happened in 1941.

During preparation of various actions of workers, discussion about trade-union autonomy, political management and possible allies of working class flamed with new force among left active workers. A number of trade-union leaders opposed precise political orientation of trade unions, declaring that they ostensibly are mass organizations outside of politicians. The fact that members of diversified parties can belong to trade-unions and on this basis fetish of trade-union unity can be raised on the banner was outlined. We are being reproached in the fact that demanding refusal from cooperation with bourgeois parties we on one hand sap the unity of the trade unions and on the other - try to get more popularity on their account. Let's see if it's really so and what is standing behind trade union political pantophagy.

So, it's clear to everyone who is interested in the slightest degree in politics that to seat the majority to the Duma won't be possible on these elections for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. The "kindest" sociologists give 19%. It's like a carrot before a nose of a neddy. A dream. I have a dream as Martin Luther King used to say. There will be 15-16% in the reality at the best state of things. It seems to me, it will be necessary to struggle even for 10 %, but I am a pessimist though well informed.